*Patriotism is believing that your country is the best simply because you were born there*


 

Dick Cheney - Halliburton - Paul Wolfowitz - Enron - The Bushes - 9-11 - Oil Wars

Meet the old leaders...same as the new leaders
Vietnam to Iraq and Afghanistan; American Criminal Foreign Policies.

Articles Of Interest

America...where nothing is as it appears!!!

Data and format compiled from Sept. 20th, 2001 to April 2010. Updated May 2011.

 

Bush already knew of 9/11 before it happened. Too many circumstances of not investigating several warnings from black ops. Planted explosives. Videos of firemen confirming explosions in the buildings. No response from our air defenses. Illegal invasions and wars. Signed agreement years prior to attack Iraq. Cheney in all the meetings pressuring the CIA. Flying Osama's family out of San Diego on the 12th of Sept before the FBI could talk to them. Fire insurance taken out just before 9/11. Bldg 7 with all the mysteries. Two weeks before 9/11 the building lost power and several mysterious crews working on the bottom floors. Bush's brother on the board of the security company which was employed for the WTC. He resigns one year before 9/11 so as not to connect the dots. Israeli Mousad dancing on a white van taking pictures and smiling. Later released after 3 months and allowed to go back to Israel. Box cutters and false Palestinian clothes found in the van. The passport of the lead highjacker floating to the ground. A small kerosene fire bringing down a steel skyscraper... no testing the structural metal afterwards...there are thousands of unanswered questions.

May 1st, 2011. The US Navy Seals shoot and kill an unarmed Osama Bin Laden in Pakistan!

What a convenient time for our gov's declaration of having killed Osama...just when we Americans are losing our trust in the gov...just when Obama's ratings are at their lowest...when our economy is in the toilet and gas prices are soaring. The truth concerning Osama is that we, the USA, recruited him to create the mujahideen in Afghanistan's war against Russia. The man was an agent and cooperative of our CIA. In the aftermath of 911 we simply needed a face to attach to our terror agenda and his was selected. It is well known that Osama needed a dialysis machine to stay alive, but they said the compound where he was killed had no electricity, etc. And it was within 600 yards of a Pakistan military outpost, but they expect us to believe their soldiers heard and saw nothing and if they did...they didn't respond??? First they said he was shot twice over the left eye...then over both eyes...then once in the eye and once in the chest. And then the navy buried him at sea in accordance with Muslim traditions...which in reality is against their religion. Yeah right! And now our gov. is rising our security threat. Here they go again...crying wolf and we are the chicken little's...crying for our gov. to protect us while they play this fear game over and over again. I don't believe a single word spewing from their lying mouths...not a damn word. As cowboys say..."put on your boots...the bullshit is getting deep."

'On June 5, 2006, the Muckraker Report contacted the FBI Headquarters, (202) 324-3000, to learn why Bin Laden's Most Wanted poster did not indicate that Usama (Osama) was also wanted in connection with 9/11. The Muckraker Report spoke with Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI. When asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden's Most Wanted web page, Tomb said, "The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden's Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11."

Our self imposed war on truth and freedom.

Quote from Julius Caesar

"Beware the leader who bangs the drums of war in order to whip the citizenry into a patriotic fervor, for patriotism is indeed a double-edged sword. It both emboldens the blood, just as it narrows the mind. And when the drums of war have reached a fever pitch and the blood boils with hate and the mind has closed, the leader will have no need in seizing the rights of the citizenry. Rather, the citizenry, infused with fear and blinded by patriotism, will offer up all of their rights unto the leader and gladly so. How do I know? For this is what I have done. And I am Caesar. (Julius Caesar)

While I, along with thousands know that Israel was involved in Sept. 11 and our 2 Middle East invasions henceforth, there are thousands of true American Jews that do not support the policies of Israel or it's supporters here and around the world.

Watch the explosions blowing out the support columns in Building 7. Proof in itself that the World Trade towers and Building 7 were wired and detonated. Watch the below video on Sept. 11 2001. Other 911 videos are also posted.

 

Watch the below video of a grassroots movement for a new open and productive investigation into 911. The main speaker is Colonial Bob Bowman, PHD and retired USAF.

 

Mainstream Media admits that 9-11 was planned. Watch the below videos!

 
 


 

Dick Cheney; Above The Law

Dick Cheney; Made his first millions stealing oil from a Wyoming National Park by cross drilling. No conviction.

"Power will intoxicate the best hearts, as wine the strongest heads.
Men are neither wise enough, nor good enough to be trusted with unlimited power."


George Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney and 9-11

Posted by Mike Smith
April 7th 2010


Sept. 14-2009; Posted News Article of "Bin Laden's" Message to the American People

Even he understands that the causes of America's Problems are Israel and the Jews!

Bin Laden; "You are waging a hopeless and losing war for the benefit of others, a war the end of which is not visible on the horizon," he said, according to a translation of the tape Sept. 14-2009 by SITE Intelligence Group, a terrorist-monitoring firm, and by The Associated Press.

Bin Laden, who was believed to be in hiding in the Afghan-Pakistan border region, said the current White House is merely following the Bush-Cheney strategy to "promote the previous policies of fear to market the interest of big companies."

When Obama retained the Bush administration's Defense Secretary Robert Gates, "reasonable people knew that Obama is a powerless man who will not be able to end the war as he promised," Bin Laden said.

Bin Laden devoted much of his address to discussing U.S. connections with Israel and castigated Americans for failing to understand that the issue was behind Al-Qaida's animosity. As he often does in his addresses, he cited books by American scholars and others that he said support his claim. Such citations also serve to show he kept close watch on current events and media despite being a fugitive in a war zone.

"The delay in your knowing those causes has cost you a lot without any result whatsoever," he said. "This position of yours, combined with some other injustices, created the events of (Sept. 11)."

"Ask yourselves to determine your position: Is your security, your blood, your children, your money, your jobs, your homes, your economy, and your reputation dearer to you than the security of the Israelis, their children and their economy?" he said.

If Americans realized the extent of their "suffering from the injustice of the Jews ... you will realize that both our nations are victims of the policies of the White House," which he described as "a hostage" to interest groups and and large companies."

__________________________________________________________________

Israeli Nuclear Weapons

Information chart from recently declassified US files depicts Israeli nuclear weapon development

It is reported they have between 100 to 400 Nuclear Weapons with over 100 Fusion Missiles.

Israel uses the holocaust excuse for building up its nuclear, chemical and biological weapons.

It's not Iran the world needs to fear!

In the recent Lebanon war Israel used spent nuclear shells, phosphorus & cluster bombs, as well as biological and chemical weapons on civilians. Over 3 thousand Lebanese were killed and many are still suffering from the effects of unknown chemical weapons used against them by Israel.

The imagery of the Dimona nuclear reactor was acquired by the Public Eye Project of the Federation of American Scientists from Space Imaging Corporation's IKONOS satellite. The cooling towers associated with the Dimona reactor are clearly visible and identifiable in satellite imagery. Comparison of recently acquired commercial IKONOS imagery with declassified American CORONA reconnaissance satellite imagery indicates that no new cooling towers were constructed in the years between 1971 and 2000. This strongly suggests that the reactor's power level has not been increased significantly during this period. This would suggest an annual production rate of plutonium of about 20 kilograms.

Based on plausible upper and lower bounds of the operating practices at the reactor, Israel could have thus produced enough plutonium for at least 100 nuclear weapons, but probably not significantly more than 200 weapons.

Some type of non-nuclear test, perhaps a zero yield or implosion test, occurred on 2 November 1966, possibly at Al-Naqab in the Negev. It is speculated that a suspected nuclear explosion in the southern Indian Ocean in 1979 was a joint South African-Israeli test. Israel was a staunch supporter of South Africa's Apartheid. That would be a certainty for gaiting control of the country's resources, gold, and diamond mines, etc.
                                                ______________________________________________________________________________________

Hundreds of Mossad Agents Caught
Running Wild in America!

After the 9-11 attacks over 200 Israeli Agents were rounded up in New York and other cities, some were held up to 70 days, but were mysteriously released. In comments made to an investigating news team, US Authorities stated; "Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information."

The information could possibly be declassified and made available in 20 to 25 years!

The Words Al Qaeda mean "Toilet" in most Arabic languages, do you really believe such a powerful terrorism organization would name itself "Toilet?"

There is no evidence, be it hard or circumstantial, to link the Al Qaeda "terrorist network" to these acts of terror, but there is a mountain of evidence, both hard and circumstantial, which suggests that Zionists have been very busy framing Arabs for terror plots against America.

Jewish companies control America's phone and instant messaging services!

The story on Israeli spying inside the focused on three companies, Amdocs, which provides billing and directory assistance for most American phone companies, Comverse Infosys, which installs and mainstains telephone tapping equipment for US law enforcement, and Odigo, which provides services for the various "Instant Message" systems on your computer. All three companies are owned by Israel and have strong ties to the Israeli Defense Force.

Both Amdocs and Comverse Infosys were implicated in the sale of telephone data which compromised US investigations into drug running, and Comverse Infosys phone taps are suspected of being the means by which Bill Clinton's phone sex sessions were recorded, as reported in the Ken Starr Report. Odigo, which had offices near the World Trade Towers, is the company which received a two hour advance warning of the attacks of 9-11.

Now, in a chilling real life version of the plotline from "The Net", it turns out that the majority of the firewalls on US corporate and government computer systems are provided by just one company, Checkpoint Systems, which like Amdocs, Comverse Infosys, and Odigo, is headquartered in Israel.

Ariel Sharon, Israel's previous Prime Minister, once declared that the Jewish people control America.

______________________________________________________

Watch a very though provoking 9-11 film of facts proving it was an inside job and that at least 9 of the supposed 19 hijackers are alive and well! In order to ascertain our huge oil contracts the invasion of Afghanistan was crucial to get the oil to the Caspian Sea.

 

 

Notice in the below video of 9-11 that no part of the plane breaks off and it retained it's speed after hitting the tower

 

 

Video of Bush & Cheney, terrorism and the murderous wars that followed 9-11

 
 

CNN & Other News Agencies Video

 

 Eye witnesses detailing that explosives were planted in the Twin Towers & Building 7

Watch this CNN & MSNBC live news report of the explosions going off in the Twin Towers

The Ultimate Con for War

 


Video Depicting the Pentagon was not hit by an Airliner

 

Building 7 suffering no damage fell 7 hours after the collapse of the Twin Towers

video broadcast by CBS - 1.4MB - mpeg
This 36-second video shows Building 7 from an elevated vantage point to the distant northeast.

CBS WTC 7 video

video from an NBC news camera - 1.5MB - mpeg
This 9-second video shows the Building 7 collapse from a vantage point about mile to the northeast on West Broadway.

Broadway WTC 7 video

video broadcast on CBS - 1.7MB - mpeg
This 9.6-second video shows the Building 7 collapse from a vantage point only about 1000 feet to the north.

West Street WTC 7 video

Videos Show Building 7's Vertical Collapse

The survival of several video recordings of Building 7's collapse, though of low resolution, allow study of the building's motion and the time of collapse.

Each of the following videos shows the entire visible portion of the building falling with a vertical precision otherwise seen only in controlled demolition. Moreover, they show that the collapse took only about 6.5 seconds from start to finish. That rate of fall is within a second of the time it would take an object to fall from the building's roof with no air resistance. No steel or other such building has ever collapsed as a result of fire in such a short time.

Larry Silverstein

The owner, Larry Silverstein would benefit quickly and very substantially from the destruction of Building Seven.

"In February of 2002 Silverstein Properties won $861 million from Industrial Risk Insurers to rebuild on the site of WTC 7.  Silverstein Properties' estimated investment in WTC 7 was $386 million. So: This building's collapse resulted in a profit of about $500 million!"

Oddly enough, this would be before any official determination was made about the cause of the building's "collapse" -- making one wonder about the good sense of the insurance company.  In fact, neither the Federal Government nor the State of New York seemed to have much interest in determining what happened to ANY of the buildings destroyed in connection with 9-11.

The Feds had quickly decided that FEMA would be the sole investigator of the buildings of 9-11, but Congress allocated no funding for the investigation.  FEMA, which is not an investigative body anyway, diverted $600,000 from its own budget, and assembled a group of volunteer engineers to create the WTC Building Performance Study.  In an all-to-familiar scenario, the engineers were never allowed to inspect the actual site of the Building Seven collapse, and were severely limited in their access to salvaged building materials, blueprints, etc.

In the end, even the government threw up its collective hands trying to find an acceptable reason for the Building Seven "collapse" that would make any sense.  The official report was released at the end of May, and concluded:

"The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown..."

However, the government's position on anything related to the tragedy was quickly solidifying into a stone wall: 9-11 in its entirety was an open and shut case - and no further research, investigation, or analyses was necessary.  By the end of May, every scrap of potential physical evidence has been seized and carted away, either to be destroyed outright, buried in a landfill, or in the case of structural steel -- shipped out of the country to India and China.

Here is the actual quote from the video aired on live TV of the interview of Larry Silverstein and his statement of having building 7 "Pulled", which is a demolition term to have the building brought down.
 

SILVERSTEIN:    I remember getting a call from the fire department commander - telling me that - they were not sure they were gonna be able (to) contain the fire. I said "you know we've had such terrible loss of life - maybe the smartest thing to do is - is pull it." Ahhh - and they made that decision to pull. And we watched the building collapse.


PBS was eventually given permission to film a documentary. After weeks of on-site filming the video was finally aired. Afterwards Silverstein became permanently unavailable to discuss it.  Eventually, a rumor was circulated that he claimed he simply didn't mean what people thought he meant -- that he was discussing pulling the firefighters from the building, and simply letting it burn.  This seemed to me to be very unlikely for a man with almost 400 million dollars invested in the building.

My first thought on viewing the video clip was to wonder if there was more than one reason for the staged confession. 
Was it possible that Silverstein was demonstrating to someone else that he could spill the beans about a lot more than Building Seven if he wasn't protected?  If so, he apparently got what he wanted.  The National Institute of Standards was soon drafted to produce a report on Building Seven to dispel the stories of controlled demolition.  The crux of the report was the classic line that we've all come to know and love, favorite of all public liars, "NIST has seen no evidence..."  This of course was embarrassingly true, all evidence was long gone.

Check out the statement of "Silverstein Properties" and see the claim that "The FEMA report concluded that the collapse of Seven World Trade Center was a direct result of fires triggered by debris from the collapse of WTC Tower 1."

Video of Larry Silverstein being questioned about 9-11

 

The Best Evidence Available on the 9-11 Conspiracy

Demolition of World Trade Center Building 7 was admitted by its developer on national television
By Don Paul

On September 14, 2002, the Public Broadcasting System (PBS) aired a documentary on reconstruction of the former World Trader Center site in lower Manhattan. The show's title was "America Rebuilds." During this PBS documentary, the developer of World Trade Center (WTC) Building 7, Larry Silverstein of Silverstein Properties, said that he and "the commander" of the New York City Fire Department had decided to "pull" WTC Building 7 late in the afternoon of September 11, 2001.

The developer, then 70 years old, whose Silverstein Properties had become the principal lease-holder of the World Trade Center's Twin Towers just seven weeks before 9/11/01, told PBS:

"I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling that they were not sure they were going to be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such a terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing is to pull it". And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."

To "pull" a building, in the lexicon of realtors and Fire Departments, is to demolish it. Thus, in its context, Larry Silverstein's repeated use of the phrase "to pull" means "to demolish." At another point, earlier in this "America Rebuilds" documentary, there is a sequence of quotes about WTC Building 6, a building also brought to ground on the morning of 9-11, which makes clear that "to pull" means to demolish:

First, the PBS documentary plays an official's voice on that horrendous morning: "Hello? We're getting ready to pull Building 6."

Then the documentary presents commentary by Luis Mendes of New York City's Department of Design and Construction: "We had to be very careful how we demolished Building 6. We were worried about Building 6 coming down and then damaging the story walls, so we wanted that particular building to fall within a certain area."

The conclusion? Larry Silverstein's nationally aired statement means, simply, that he and others must have prepared WTC Building 7 for demolition. Could this preparation for demolition have taken place on a single afternoon? As we will see below, because it was a 47-story skyscraper containing 2 million square feet of office space, this preparation must have taken at least several weeks. Several weeks, that is, before Sept. 11, 2001.

For a Controlled Demolition, Call Controlled Demolition, Inc.

Controlled Demoliton, Inc. (CDI), of Baltimore, Maryland is one of the world's leaders in demolishing large buildings. Owned for three generations by the Loizeaux family, CDI details on its website the 'World Records' that the company holds in demolishing huge structures -- monuments such as the former Kingdome in Seattle. The CDI website also relates the time spans that have been required for the company's accomplishments.

How much time would be required for the planning and emplacement of charges for the symmetric implosion of WTC Building 7 that we saw on 9-11? WTC Building 7 was a 47-story tower that sat less than 100 feet from other skyscrapers. We read on the CDI site about a 17-story building of reinforced concrete in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia -- the Sheikh A. Alaki Apartment Building -- which collapsed while under construction by the Bechtel Corporation in 1998.

The CDI site relates: 'At the request of Bechtel, Controlled Demolition, Inc.'s team mobilized to the site in less than 24 hours, prepared the central-core, flat slab, reinforced concrete structure in another 27 hours, and put the balance of the building on the ground with absolute safety just 96 hours after the start of demolition preparations.'

96 hours, four days. This was the time needed for emergency demolition of a 17-story building of reinforced concrete by a CDI team. Preparation for demolition of WTC Building 7 must have preceded 9-11 by weeks, if not months.

A building in Detroit, Mich. of comparable size to WTC Building 7 -- the J L Hudson store, standing 35 stories tall and containing 2.2 million square feet -- took CDI almost five months to prepare and bring down in 1998.

The CDI site reports that after four months of study by associate contractors:

CDI's 12-person loading crew took 24 days to place 4,118 separate charges in 1,100 locations on columns on nine levels of the complex. Over 36,000 ft of detonating cord and 4,512 non-electric delay elements were installed in CDI's implosion initiation system, some to create the 36 primary implosion sequences and another 216 micro-delays to keep down the detonation overpressure from the 2,728 lbs of explosives which would be detonated during the demolition.

So. Four months, plus an additional 24 days, were needed to place the charges necessary to demolish, within its 420-foot-by-220-foot footprint, a building 12 stories smaller than WTC Building 7.

How, then, could the preparation and emplacement of charges to "pull" WTC Building 7 be accomplished in a single afternoon? In particular, during the tumultuous afternoon of Sept. 11, 2001, right there at 'Ground Zero'?

What It All Means

Larry Silverstein's statement on national television means that the preparation for demolition of WTC Building 7 must have preceded 9-11 by weeks, if not months.

Upon a moment of reflection, the developer's statement also means that al Queda could not be at all involved in this most revealing part of the horrific 9-11 crimes.

It means, upon further reflection, that only those with secret access to WTC Building 7's 25 central columns and 58 perimeter columns of structural steel could have been responsible for placing the charges that accomplished its symmetric, precipitous, inward collapse which took no more than a gravity-like 6.5 seconds as all of the skyscraper's 570-foot-high mass crashed to the ground. It means that the building's developer and lease-holder, Larry Silverstein, himself, was probably integrally involved in the 9-11 conspiracy. It means also that WTC Building 7's mortgage-holders on 9-11, the Blackstone Group, Banc of America Securities, and the General Motors Acceptance Corporation, were probably also privy to the protracted planning and placing of explosive charges within their property. It means that these three pillars of the United States' financial establishment were probably integrally involved in the conspiracy both to commit the terrible crimes of 9-11 and to reap enormous profits from the consequent "War on Terrorism."

When we look at the different, but nearly equally obvious, demolitions of the World Trade Center's Twin Towers, and consider the amount of time needed for the planning and placement of charges to collapse these gigantic structures as they actually fell (straight down into their footprints), we see that the entity which controlled the Twin Towers for decades and which awarded the lease of the Twin Towers to the consortium of realtors headed by Silverstein Properties in April 2001 -- the New York Port Authority -- must also come under suspicion in the emplacement of the charges that were necessary for the demolitions and the killing of more than two thousand people.

Connecting the Dots

Banc of America Securities. The General Motors Acceptance Corporation. The New York Port Authority. We're led still deeper into the heart of the United States' financial establishment, for the New York Port Authority is a body long controlled by the family most powerful and manipulative in Manhattan real estate: the Rockefeller family.

Of the Rockefellers, the banker David, head of both the Chase Manhattan Bank and the Council on Foreign Relations from the late 1960s into the 1980s, was the main mover behind construction of the World Trade Center from the early 1960s forward. During this period of construction, David's brother, Nelson, was Governor of New York, and thus, as Governor, the ultimate, nominal boss of the New York Port Authority, the entity that was for many years the largest tenant (with 20,000 employees resident) in either Tower.

In October 2000, David Rockefeller's close associate Peter G. Peterson, who was Chairman of both the Council of Foreign Relations and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York on 9-11, led the multifold-investment company of which he was also Chairman, the Blackstone Group, into purchase of the portion of the mortgage on WTC Building 7 that was held by the Traveler's Group.

The lease has an all-important escape clause: If the buildings are struck by "an act of terrorism," the new owners' obligations under the lease are void. As a result, the new owners are not required to make any payments under their lease, but they will be able to collect on the loss of the buildings that collapses or were otherwise destroyed and damaged in the attacks.

In February of 2002, the Blackstone Group, Banc of America Securities, the General Motors Acceptance Corporation, and Silverstein Properties shared in a award from Industrial Risk Insurers of $861 million for loss of the obviously demolished WTC Building 7. The total investment of the lease-holder and mortgage-holders for WTC 7 was $386 million. Thus they shared in a profit of $475 million for the demolished Building 7.

At the time of the Towers' transfer from the New York Port Authority to Silverstein Properties they faced much more than $1 billion in costs for renovation and asbestos-removal. Eric Darton's excellent study of the World Trade Center, Divided We Stand, published in 2000, summarizes the property's problems as real estate:

'To maintain the trade center as class-A office space commanding top rents, the [Port Authority] would have had to spend $800 million rebuilding the electrical, electronic communication, and cooling systems.'

These problems were, of course, removed from the Port Authority when it leased away the Twin Towers and World Trade Center Buildings 4, 5, 6 and 400,000 feet of retail space to the consortium led by Silverstein Properties seven weeks prior to 9-11. The $3.2 billion long-term price for the 99-year lease was widely thought to be low for properties estimated to be worth $8 billion over that time-span. JP Morgan Chase, the flagship of Rockefeller-controlled Banks, advised the Port Authority in the award of this lease. The new lease-holders immediately took out insurance policies worth more than the total, long-term price of their new WTC holdings. Silverstein Properties itself invested only $15 million of the less than $600 million actually transferred to the Port Authority. The British Financial Times reported on September 14, 2001:

Taking It to the Bank

In April 2004, Silverstein Properties and its partners won an award of $4.8 billion from their claim for $7.1 billion in losses to their 2001 World Trade Center acquisitions as a result of the 9-11 attacks.

Other insurance-related profits followed from the mass destruction and death in lower Manhattan on 9-11. There were huge increases in the premiums subsequently paid to the largest surviving insurer corporations. In this regard, an interview CDI Executive Mark Loizeaux gave to New Scientist in July 2004 is instructive. The CDI executive was asked: 'But 9/11 has also sent your insurance up, hasn't it?' Mark Loizeaux replied: 'It's gone up about 2000 percent since 9-11. Not only because of 9-11 but because insurance companies lost a great deal of money in the stock market collapse just preceding 9-11 with the collapse of dot.coms.'

The amounts of revenue and profit for two of the largest US insurer Corporations -- Warren Buffet's Berkshire Hathaway and Maurice Greenberg's American International Group -- between 2002 and 2003 were exorbitant.2

Large as these amounts to insurer corporations are, they're dwarfed by the post-9/11 financial gains from the "War on Terrorism" accruing to: oil-and-gas corporations such as Chevron, Exxon, British Peteroleum and Royal Dutch Shell; weapons-making corporations such as Lockheed Martin, Northrup Grunman, and General Dynamics; and money-laundering banks and stock markets through which the post-2001 $180-billion-per-year in profits from Afghan-grown opium are flowing. These profits are charted or noted in Waking Up from Our Nightmare: The 9-11 Crimes in New York City, a book Jim Hoffman and I have written.

All of these corporations are connected in multiple ways through their interlocking boards of directors and major stock-holders. As of 1993, the Rockefeller family was among the top five vote-holders in 93 of the United States' 122 largest corporations. As of 1997, the Chase Bank and Citigroup controlled more than half the stock of the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

All of these corporations have vital connections to the heart of the US financial establishment, which is thoroughly represented among the financiers who constructed or controlled the World Trade Center before the demolition of the Twin Towers and WTC Building 7.

Thus, developer and lease-holder Larry Silverstein's nationally televised statement concerning the decision to "pull" WTC Building 7 is itself the most clear-cut key we now have on the public record for unlocking the whole of the conspiracy which orchestrated the demolitions and the resulting murder of thousands in lower Manhattan on Sept. 11, 2001, as the pretext for more war outside the US and more repression inside.

Don Paul, author and activist, recommends www.wtc7.net for more information on what really happened on 9-11. Books and albums of his are up at www.wireonfire.com/donpaul.

The profits of US insurer Corporations Berkshire Hathaway and American International Group between 2002 and 2003 are charted at www.wtc7.net.

Watch the below Video of police & firemen telling people that Building 7 was being blown.
 

 
 

  1. Destruction proceeds through the path of greatest resistance at nearly free-fall acceleration

  2. Improbable symmetry of debris distribution

  3. Extremely rapid onset of destruction

  4. Over 100 first responders reported explosions and flashes

  5. Multi-ton steel sections ejected laterally

  6. Mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete & metal decking

  7. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like clouds

  8. 1200-foot-diameter debris field: no "pancaked" floors found

  9. Isolated explosive ejections 20–40 stories below demolition front

  10. Total building destruction: dismemberment of steel frame

  11. Several tons of molten metal found under all 3 high-rises

  12. Evidence of thermite incendiaries found by FEMA in steel samples

  13. Evidence of explosives found in dust samples

And exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire:
 

  1. Slow onset with large visible deformations

  2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, intact, from the point of plane impact, to the side most damaged by the fires)

  3. Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel

  4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer-lasting fires have never collapsed.

Those who still buy into the monumental lie that aircraft caused the collapse of both WTC Towers, cannot explain how a steel beam weighing twice as much as a Boeing 767 flew from one WTC building over 390 feet to bury itself into the neighboring American Express building. No steel framed building has ever collapsed from fire, as it would be impossible.

The 9/11 attacks were created for justification of US covert plans to grab influence over oil politics in the Middle East and as an excuse to take away the rest of Americans' liberties through a manufactured threat-scenario called, "The War On Terror."

There were dozens and dozens of reports by rescue workers on the ground at the WTC complex that heard explosions over an hour after the planes crashed into the towers. They felt explosions under their feet that were so powerful that seismographs registered them at 2.1 and 2.3 on the Richter scale. Only explosions could have caused them.

The weekend before the 9/11 WTC demolition, all power was shut down to install "computer cables." No one was allowed inside and all security cameras and alarms had no power for 30 hours.

Computer cables don't connect with building electricity, so the need to turn off and close both towers to do so is indicative of another motive, like planting charges without alarms and video surveillance. Marvin Bush, brother to President George and Jeb Bush, Gov. of FL., was a principal in Securacom, which was in charge of security for the World Trade Center. Didn't hear that on the TV news, did you?

The WTC was the biggest crime, mass murder, 'hijackings' and air crashes in US history. Yet all the forensic evidence was immediately removed, buried or shipped to smelters so that not one investigator from any agency could inspect it. Only our government has that kind of power?

Even harder to explain is why WTC Building 7, a block away, collapsed "because of fire," when it received no damage from the Twin Towers' collapse. No other skyscraper in the world ever collapsed because of a fire of any type, including that from a B25 bomber crashing into the Empire State Building decades ago. And one puzzling visual were the tons of un-scorched paper flying over the city? So we are supposed to believe that the fires were intense enough to melt a million tons of steel, but not burn paper?

Of all the air crashes in the USA over the past three decades, how many ground crashes resulted in not recovering their black boxes, containing pilots' voices (CVRs) and aircraft telemetries (FDRs) before and during impact? Yet not one usable black box was ever recovered from any of the four planes that reputedly were hijacked on 9/11. Not one.

Flight 93 that contained the "Let's roll!" myth, where four passengers supposedly tried to overpower the hijackers, did not crash into one small area like it should have done. It's debris was spread over 8 miles, indicating that it was shot down by a military fighter jet, exploding in the sky and raining down debris over eight miles, "witnesses said it looked like confetti." A crashing plane's debris is limited to a 1/4 to a 1/2 mile, but if it was shot down and exploded high in the air it's debris would definitely be scattered over several miles.

The Real War is not on Terrorism, but on Oil Fields and against our rights!

Controlled Demolition

Buildings only fall vertically like Building 7 when destroyed by controlled demolition.

The controlled demolition of large structures is a well developed art and science. Removing a tall building from an urban landscape without damaging adjacent structures -- a considerable engineering feat -- is a task that only a handful of controlled demolitions companies specialize in. One such company is Controlled Demolition Inc., which, incidentally, was subcontracted by Tully Construction to coordinate the removal of rubble from Ground Zero and the disposal of the structural steel in the months following the attack.

The steel skeletons of buildings like WTC 7 are extremely robust. They are designed to withstand earthquakes and hurricanes, and are over-engineered to handle several times the maximum loads anticipated during their lifetimes. Such steel skeletons have local structural integrity. An event that destroyed one portion of the structure would not cause distant portions to shatter. If some force obliterated the load-bearing columns well below the top of a 600-foot tall skyscraper, the top of the building would topple like a tree, not smash its way down through intact floors and into its foundation.

Controlled demolition destroys vertical steel structures while overcoming their tendency to topple onto adjacent real-estate. It does so by shattering the steel skeleton through the precisely timed detonation of explosive charges.

Demolitions are large undertakings with high stakes. The number of charges required is at least the number of columns times some fraction of the number of floors. An error in timing of the detonations could cause expensive collateral damage.

Most demolitions seek to implode the building, causing the mass to move toward the center, resulting in a tidy rubble pile. In tall buildings this is typically done by shattering the interior structures of the building first or ahead of the exterior structures. That causes the interior mass to fall first, pulling outer structures toward the center. Pieces of the outer walls end up on top of the rubble pile.

Building 7's documented vertical plunge and tidy rubble pile with exterior wall fragments on top are exactly the kinds of results that controlled demolitions achieve through careful engineering.

The Vertical Collapse of Building 7

Building 7 collapsed in a nearly perfectly vertical motion at near the rate of free-fall. The first sign of the collapse is the falling of the penthouse, immediately followed by the falling of the whole facade, as seen from either the north and south. The middle of the building's north wall fell slightly faster than its edges.

vertical collapse of WTC Building 7 vertical collapse of WTC Building 7

These two video frames appear in Chapter 5 of FEMA's WTC Building Performance Study . Note that most of the white smoke above the building is from the burning debris of the collapsed towers.

The straight-down fall of the building's top can bebuilding 7 rubble clearly seen in photographs and videos. In the pair of images above, note that the position of Building 7's right wall remains in almost exactly the same horizontal position despite having fallen over 100 feet. 

Dust engulfed the building when the roof had fallen to within about 15 stories of street level. The nature of the collapse past that point can be inferred by the shape of the rubble pile and the fact that it was covered by the remains of the exterior walls. This means that, not only did the building continue to fall vertically until the end, the outer walls were pulled inward so that they fell on top of the rubble pile.

In short, Building 7 imploded. Buildings are not designed to implode. They are designed to remain standing. To achieve a precisely vertical collapse, in which the remains of the building fall inward, is the objective of controlled demolition.

The Destruction of Building 7's Remains

Engineering is a science that melds theory and experience to create robust structures. Unintended structural failures are rare events that warrant the most careful scrutiny, since they test engineering theory.

That is why the NTSB carefully documents aircraft crash scenes, and preserves the aircraft remains, frequently creating partial reconstructions in hangars. If an investigation reveals a mechanical or design fault, the FAA usually mandates specific modifications of equipment or maintenance procedures system-wide, and future aircraft are designed to avoid the fault.

Unintended structural failures are less common in steel-framed high-rises than in aircraft. Being the only such building in history in which fire is blamed for total collapse, Building 7's remains warranted the most painstaking examination, documentation, and analysis. Building 7's rubble pile was at least as important as any archeological dig. It contained all the clues to one of the largest structural failures in history. Without understanding the cause of the collapse, all skyscrapers become suspect, with profound implications for the safety of occupants and for the ethics of sending emergency personnel into burning buildings to save people and fight fires.

There was no legitimate reason not to dismantle the rubble pile carefully, documenting the position of each piece of steel and moving it to a warehouse for further study. No one was thought buried in the pile, since, unlike the Twin Towers, Building 7 had been evacuated hours before the collapse. The pile was so well confined to the building's footprint that the adjacent streets could have been cleared without disturbing it.

Yet, despite the paramount importance of the remains, they were hauled away and melted down as quickly as possible. The steel was sold to scrap metal vendors and most of it was soon on ships bound for China and India. Some of the smaller pieces and a few token large pieces of steel marked 'save' were allowed to be inspected at Fresh Kills landfill by FEMA's BPAT volunteers.

This illegal evidence destruction operation was conducted over the objections of attack victims' family members and respected public safety officials. Bill Manning, editor of the 125-year-old Fire Engineering Magazine, wrote in an article condemning the operation:

Did they throw away the locked doors from the Triangle Shirtwaist fire? Did they throw away the gas can used at the happy land social club fire? ... That's what they're doing at the World Trade Center. The destruction and removal of evidence must stop immediately.

Dr. Frederick W. Mowrer, an associate professor in the Fire Protection Engineering Department at the University of Maryland, was quoted in the New York Times as saying:

"I find the speed with which potentially important evidence has been removed and recycled to be appalling."

Officials running the "cleanup operation" took pains to make sure the structural steel didn't end up anywhere but in blast furnaces. They installed GPS locator devices on each of the trucks hauling loads from Ground Zero at a cost of $1000 each. One driver who took an extended lunch break was dismissed.

What Caused Building 7's Collapse?

This question would appear to be the greatest in engineering history. In over 100 years of experience with steel-framed buildings, fires have never caused the collapse of a single one, even though many were ravaged by severe fires. Indeed, fires have never caused the total collapse of any permanent steel structure.

What was done to answer this most important question? The only official body that admits to having investigated the curious collapse of Building 7 is FEMA's Building Performance Assessment Team (BPAT), which blamed fires for the collapse but admitted to being clueless about how fires caused the collapse.

People who have seen buildings implode in controlled demolitions are unlikely to be as challenged as FEMA's team in understanding the cause of Building 7's collapse. They will notice, upon watching the videos, that Building 7's collapse showed all of the essential features of a controlled demolition.

Despite having the appearance of a controlled demolition, is it possible that Building 7 could have been destroyed by some combination of damage from tower debris, fuel tank explosions, and fires? Let's consider the possible scenarios.

NIST released a photograph in 2005 showing a large gouge in the lower portion of the southwest corner of Building 7, and its collapse scenario deviates significantly from FEMA's in emphasizing alleged structural damage from the collapse of the North Tower. That photograph is notable for its lack of corroboration, and NIST's claims of other regions of damage to the building's south face lack substantiating evidence. Even if NIST's claims about structural damage from North Tower debris were true, it would not begin to explain the precipitous, symmetrical manner in which Building 7 collapsed. Structural damage to the south side -- particularly to the lower stories -- would have made any kind of vertical collapse all the more unlikely.

The idea that diesel fuel stored in Building 7 is to blame for the collapse was promoted by The New York Times in late 2001 and by FEMA's 2002 Building Performance Study.  This idea is also untenable. Fires were observed in Building 7 prior to its collapse, but they were isolated in small parts of the building, and were puny by comparison to other building fires. Let's imagine, contrary to the evidence, that debris from the tower collapses view of WTC 7 showing entire elevationdamaged Building 7's structure, that diesel fuel tanks exploded, and that incredibly intense fires raged through large parts of the building. Could such events have caused the building to collapse? Not in the manner observed. The reason is that simultaneous and symmetric damage is needed to produce a collapse with the precise symmetry of the vertical fall of building 7. This building had 58 perimeter columns and 25 core columns. In order to cause the building to sink into its footprint, all of the core columns and all of the perimeter columns would have to be broken in the same split-second.

Any debris from the towers impacting Building 7 would have hit its south side, and any columns damaged by it would almost certainly be perimeter columns on its south side. Any fuel tank explosion would only be able to damage nearby structure. The rapid fall-off of blast pressures with distance from the source would preclude any such event from breaking all of the columns in the building.

(Furthermore the very idea of a tank of diesel fuel exploding taxes the imagination, since diesel fuel does not even begin to boil below 320º F.) Fires have never been known to damage steel columns in high-rise buildings, but if they could, the damage would be produced gradually and would be localized to the areas where the fire was the most intense.

No combination of debris damage, fuel-tank explosions, and fires could inflict the kind of simultaneous damage to all the building's columns required to make the building implode. The precision of such damage required to bring Building 7 down into its footprint was especially great, given the ratio of its height to its width and depth. Any asymmetry in the extent and timing of the damage would cause such a building to topple.


Fires Versus Steel Buildings

The official explanation that fires caused the collapse of Building 7 and the Twin Towers is incredible in light of the fact that fires have never caused a steel-framed building to totally collapse, before or after September 11th, 2001.

Steel-framed high-rises (buildings of fifteen stories or more) have been common for more than 100 years. There have been hundreds of incidents involving severe fires in such buildings, and none have led to complete collapse, or even partial collapse of support columns. view of fire in First Interstate Building in Los Angeles

Recent examples of high-rise fires include the 1991 One Meridian Plaza fire in Philadelphia, which raged for 18 hours and gutted 8 floors of the 38-floor building; and the 1988 First Interstate Bank Building fire in Los Angeles, which burned out of control for 3-1/2 hours and gutted 4 floors of the 64 floor tower. Both of these fires were far more severe than any fires seen in the Twin Towers or Building 7, but those buildings did not collapse. The Los Angeles fire was described as producing "no damage to the main structural members."

Research indicates that even if a steel-framed building were subjected to an impossible super-fire, hundreds of degrees hotter and far more extensive then any fire ever observed in a real building, it would still not collapse. Appendix A of The World Trade Center Building Performance Study contains the following:


In building fires outside of such laboratory experiments, steel beams and columns probably never exceed 500º C. In extensive fire tests of steel frame car-parks conducted by Corus Construction in several countries, measured temperatures of the steel columns and beams, including in uninsulated structures, never exceeded 360ºC.

In retrospect of the prompt disposal of all the material and the lack of any investigations is not surprising.  It is difficult today to find any 9-11 "fact" offered by the Bush Administration that has the ability to withstand close scrutiny.  In general they show either basic flaws in reasoning, a complete lack of corroborating evidence, or the familiar syndrome in which one question simply leads to more questions that the government refuses to acknowledge, let alone answer.

In June it was revealed that an individual who had a high level security clearance and was stationed in the Office of Emergency Management in World Trade Center 7 witnessed explosions and damage to the lobby of the building before either twin tower had collapsed.

The testimony of these individuals meshes with others in confirming that Building 7 was deliberately brought down on the day of 9/11, a fact that eviscerates official investigations into Building 7 as nothing more than part of an orchestrated cover-up.

In February of 2002 Silverstein Properties won $861 million from Industrial Risk Insurers to rebuild on the site of WTC 7. Silverstein Properties’ estimated investment in WTC 7 was $386 million. This building’s collapse alone resulted in a payout of nearly $500 million, based on the contention that it was an unforeseen accidental event.

A cursory insight into professional building demolition tells us that experts are required to spend weeks and months planning the demolition of any building, ensuring that the explosives are placed in exactly the right spots, that the collapse will not impact surrounding buildings, and that a myriad of sufficient safety procedures are followed.

To imagine that demolition experts could rig such a huge building amidst the chaos of the day, unsure of whether further attacks were coming, in a matter of hours and bring the building down neatly in its own footprint without afflicting major damage to adjacent buildings is beyond belief.

Even if one entertains the notion that this is within the realm of possibility, the fact is that the federal government, FEMA and NIST and Silverstein Properties are all knowingly lying in claiming that the building collapsed by accident as a result of burning debris from the twin towers.

Now it is established that they lied about Building 7, how can we trust their often changing explanations of the collapse of the twin towers, especially considering the dozens and dozens of eyewitnesses who have gone on the record to report the fact that explosives were seen and heard on all levels of both towers, including underground explosions before the planes even hit?

We are being asked to put our faith in either the federal government, who deliberately lied about 9/11 in the very days after the attack in telling emergency workers and firefighters that the toxic air was safe to breathe , or the emergency workers and other rescue heroes who risked their lives and are still suffering the consequences of their courage.

This testimony demands an immediate grand jury inquiry into both monolithic insurance fraud, potential manslaughter, and a complete re-appraisal and re-investigation into everything else that happened on 9/11 in an effort to discover what else the government lied about concerning the events of that day and its aftermath.

No Burial for the 9-11 remains, so said a Jewish US District Judge.

U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein, saying the city’s decisions about where to off-load the debris “were difficult and complicated,” found the city had “acted responsibly” in bringing about a “swift and efficient recovery from the terrorists’ attack.”

The lawsuit, filed in 2005 by a group called WTC Families for a Proper Burial, sought to have the estimated 1.2 million to 1.8 million tons of rubble originally from the World Trade Center site transferred out of the Fresh Kills landfill located on New York’s borough of Staten Island.

The families said the city should move the residue that had been finely sifted multiple times to a more suitable location and have a cemetery created.

The Pentagon

The damage to the building was far less than can be accounted from a direct hit of a Boeing 757

2.1.3 –0.05 seconds: How does the Final Official Report account for the intact cable spools in the trajectory of the aircraft?

ASCE, p. 16

The short answer is: in no way. The spools are not not so much as mentioned despite the fact that they are conspicuous in numerous photographs taken at the site, including this one from the Report (to which numbers of the spools have been added). With the help of this picture it is possible to see that the largest spools were 6 to 7 ft tall, for even though they are in the background of the firemen, the largest ones are nearly as high in pixels.

What was the exact location of the spools in relation to the aircraft's trajectory? The answer to this question is presented below. The analysis on which it is based can be found here.

Where's The Plane Wreckage, the dead passengers, their baggage?

ASCE Report, p. 16

___________________________________________________________


Interesting Article about the French Intelligence, George W. Bush, Al Qaeda and Israel's MOSSAD SS.

Article posted- Saturday October 11, 2008 at 8:30 p.m. EST

French Intelligence Fingers Israeli Planned FALSE FLAG Attack on American Soil

United States of America – It can now be reported that after the G7's conference today in Washington, D.C., a private meeting took place between U.S. White House occupant George W. Bush, fraudster, and French Finance Minister Christine LaGarde. Who may now, May, 2011, be elected as the new President of the IMF (International Monetary Fund). The previous, (photo on left) Dominique Strauss-Kahn, also of France, was arrested in NYC for rape in May 2011. Both are Socialist.

French Finance Minister Christine LaGarde showed the alleged President George W. Bush "smoking gun" evidence detailing Israeli MOSSAD infiltration of major Al Qaeda cells in Yemen, which were used to attack the U.S. Embassy in Sana'a last month on September 17th.

(I'm pretty sure the Bush quisling already knew all about it and made the statement confirming it when he went on to say the powers to be were what kept him in office)

French Finance Minister Christine LaGarde also showed Bush evidence uncovered by French Intelligence detailing the ISRAELI MOSSAD's plan to use private mercenaries and compromised Israeli Mossad-Al Qaeda cells on U.S. soil to launch a major terrorist attack on the United States a week before the upcoming November presidential election.

This attack will coincide with a major worldwide "financial" terrorist attack on all U.S. equities and bonds as to finish off the United States of America as a Republic and reduce it to a third world nation and plunge the United States into poverty and anarchy.

A new alliance has developed involving Israel, the United Kingdom, the Russian Federation, China and the German Federal Republic.

This alliance believes the United States is finished as it no longer has any financial foundation and, accordingly, is no longer useful given the fact that the U. S. Treasury has been completely looted.

Accordingly, the new alliance figures it is time to finish off the United States and scrape up the left over remains of what was once a great nation.

Ask yourself why the French didn't join us in our fraudulent wars in Iraq & Afghanistan
Because they knew that 911 was an inside job and that Iraq had no WMDs

The Jewish hand behind Internet The Jews behind Google, Facebook, Wikipedia, Yahoo!, MySpace, eBay, AP (associated press), Reuters, as well as the majority of world's news media are controlled by the Rothschilds. The Jews control Wall Street, banks, most financial institutions, telecom, phone and internet and so much more!

Where there's wealth or power they're Jews controlling it.

Even Bill Clinton was bought and paid for by his Jewish supports;

According to a report published in the London Economist after the 1992 election, 60 per cent of all private contributions to Clinton’s campaign fund came from American Jews.

Below photo of G.W. Bush with his masters.

Obama raised by the Zionists to become President

The sheep represent us...baaaa

 2008 U.S. Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton

In July 26, 2000, during Hillary Clinton's campaign for Congress from New York, Jewish senator Charles Schumer ("a recognized leader in Jewish issues on Capitol Hill") was recorded on videotape at a fund raiser for the President's wife. He responded to questions by Jews present about Israel, saying, "My guess is [Ms. Clinton] will vote exactly as I vote on Jewish issues. She will look to me to see how to vote ... Is she going to be a leading voice in the Senate? No. Is she going to have the same feeling about it that I do -- born Jewish? No. But she will be good." "Schumer," noted the Associated Press, "in shirt sleeves, chatted casually with supporters on the tape, seemingly unaware that a camera was rolling." (Associated Press, 7-27-2000)

 

CIA - Enron - Dick Cheney - Halliburton - Paul Wolfowitz - Commercialism - Federal Reserve - 9-11 Wall Street - Zionists - IMF - Jews - Mossad - George W. Bush - Oil Wars - Al Qaeda